Научный журнал ВолНЦ РАН (печатное издание)
27.11.202411.2024с 01.01.2024
Просмотры
Посетители
* - в среднем в день за текущий месяц
RuEn

рубрика "Социальное и экономическое развитие"

Открытая и латентная безработица в условиях пандемии

Соболева И.В., Соболев Э.Н.

Том 14, №5, 2021

Соболева И.В., Соболев Э.Н. Открытая и латентная безработица в условиях пандемии // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2021. Т. 14. № 5. С. 186–201. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.11

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.11

Аннотация   |   Авторы   |   Список литературы
  1. Cevik E.I., Dibooglu S., Barisik S. Asymmetry in the unemployment–output relationship over the business cycle: Evidence from transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies, 2013, vol. 55, pp. 557–581. DOI:10.1057/ces.2013.7
  2. Блинова Т.В., Русановский В.А., Марков В.А. Оценка реакции циклической безработицы на экономический спад и восстановительный рост в России // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2020. Т. 13. № 6. С. 184–198. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.6.72.11
  3. Dreger Ch., Gros D. Lockdowns and the US unemployment crisis. IZA Policy Paper. Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), 2021, no. 170.
  4. Dunn A., Grasso T., Saunders C. Unemployment and attitudes to work: Asking the “right” question. Work, Employment and Society, 2014, vol. 28(6), pp. 904–925. DOI: 10.1177/0950017014529008
  5. Mavromaras K., Sloane P., Wei Z. The scarring effects of unemployment, low pay and skills under-utilization in Australia compared. Applied Economics, 2015, vol. 47(23), pp. 2413–2429. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1008762
  6. Egdell V., Beck V. A capability approach to understand the scarring effects of unemployment and job insecurity: Developing the research. Work, Employment and Society, 2020, vol. 34 (5), pp. 937–948. DOI: 10.1177%2F0950017020909042
  7. Brandt M., Hank K. Scars that will not disappear: Long-term associations between early and later life unemployment under different welfare regimes. Journal of Social Policy, 2014, vol. 43(4), pp. 727–743. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279414000397
  8. Grzegorczyk M., Wolff G. The scarring effect of COVID-19: Youth unemployment in Europe. Bruegel Blog, 2020, November 28. Available at: https://www.bruegel.org/2020/11/the-scarring-effect-of-covid-19-youth-unemployment-in-europe/ (accessed: August 20, 2021)
  9. Achdut N., Refaeli T. Unemployment and psychological distress among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological resources and risk factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17(19), no. 7163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197163
  10. Lambovska M., Sardinha B., Belas J. Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on youth unemployment in the European Union. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 2021, vol. 15(1), pp. 55–63. DOI: 10.26552/ems.2021.1.55-63
  11. Truc T.M., Button P., Picciotti E.G. Early evidence on the impact of COVID-19 and the recession on older workers. NBER Working paper, 2020, June, no. 27448. DOI: 10.3386/w27448.
  12. Crawford R., Karjalainen H. The Coronavirus Pandemic and Older Workers. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2020, September. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/uploads/BN305-The-coronavirus-pandemic-and-older-workers.pdf (accessed: August 20, 2021).
  13. Капелюшников Р.И. Российский рынок труда: адаптация без реструктуризации. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2001. 309 с.
  14. Гимпельсон В.Е., Капелюшников Р.И. Российская модель рынка труда: испытание кризисом // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2015. № 2. С. 249–254.
  15. Соболев Э.Н. Оплата труда в российской экономике: тенденции и проблемы // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. 2018. № 5. С. 79–96.
  16. Adams-Prassl A., Boneva T. et al. Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public Economics, 2020, vol. 189, no. 13183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245
  17. Попова Д.О. Предварительные оценки изменения неравенства под влиянием пандемии и мер налогово-бюджетной политики // Аналитический бюллетень НИУ ВШЭ об экономических и социальных последствиях коронавируса в России и в мире. 2020. № 10. С. 53–61.
  18. Hershbein B.J., Holzer H.J. The COVID-19 pandemic’s evolving impacts on the labor market: Who’s been hurt and what we should do. Upjohn Institute Working Paper, 2021, vol. 21, no. 341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17848/wp21-341
  19. Dalton M., Groen J.A., Loewenstein M.A. et al. The k-shaped recovery: examining the diverging fortunes of workers in the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic using business and household survey microdata. Covid Economics, 2021, no. 71, pp. 19–58.
  20. Galasso V. Covid: Not a great equalizer. Covid Economics, 2020, no. 19, pp. 241–255.
  21. Guven C., Sotirakopoulos P., Aydogan U. Shortterm labour market effects of COVID-19 and the associated national lockdown in Australia: Evidence from longitudinal labour force survey. GLO Discussion Paper, 2020, no. 635.
  22. Campa P., Roine J., Strömberg S. Unemployment inequality in the pandemic: Evidence from Sweden. CEPR Discussion Paper, 2021, July, no. DP16330. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3886816
  23. Simpson W. Is Basic Income within Reach? Building the Case Amidst Progress and Poverty. Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-66085-7
  24. Gentilin U., Grosh M. et al. Exploring Universal Basic Income: A Guide to Navigating Concepts, Evidence, and Practices. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32677
  25. Бобков В.Н., Одинцова Е.В., Черных Е.А. Безусловный базовый доход как регулятор повышения уровня и качества жизни: постановка проблемы и введение в анализ // Народонаселение. 2020. Т. 23. № 1. С. 13–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.1.2
  26. Лищук Е.Н., Капелюк С.Д. Трудоустройство молодых специалистов на российском рынке труда // Экономика труда. 2019. Т. 6. № 3. С. 1079–1092. DOI: 10.18334/et.6.3.40871
  27. Mooi-Reci I., Ganzeboom H.B. Unemployment scarring by gender: Human capital depreciation or stigmatization? Longitudinal evidence from the Netherlands, 1980–2000. Social Science Research, 2015, vol. 52, pp. 642–658. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.10.005
  28. Баскакова М.Е., Соболева И.В. Малый бизнес: качество занятости и соблюдение трудовых прав // Россия и современный мир. 2017. № 2 (95). С. 57–74.
  29. Madsen P.K. How can it possibly fly? The paradox of a dynamic labour market in a Scandinavian state. In: National identity and the varieties of capitalism: The Danish experience. Campbell I.P., Hall J.A., Pedersen O.K. (Eds.). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006. Pp. 321–355.
  30. Bekker S., Mailand M. The European flexicurity concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models: How have they managed the Great Recession? Social Policy & Administration, 2019, vol. 53 (1), pp. 142–155. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12441
  31. Mailand M. The common European flexicurity principles: How a fragile consensus was reached. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2010, vol. 16 (3), pp. 241–257. DOI: 10.1177/0959680110375134
  32. Noja G.G. Flexicurity models and productivity interference in C.E.E. countries: A new approach based on cluster and spatial analysis. Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2018, vol. 31(1), pp. 1111–1136. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1456356

Полная версия статьи