VolRC RAS scientific journal
RuEn

Journal section "Theoretical and methodological issues"

Communicative Concept of the Social Contract and Formation of the Course of Economic Development

Dementiev V.E.

Volume 16, Issue 4, 2023

Dementiev V.E. (2023). Communicative concept of the social contract and formation of the course of economic development. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(4), 57–70. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.3

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.3

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Abramowitz A., McCoy J. (2019). United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 137–156.
  2. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. (2006). Economic backwardness in political perspective. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 115–131. DOI:10.1017/S0003055406062046
  3. Azzimonti M. (2011). Barriers to investment in polarized societies. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2182–2204. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.5.2182
  4. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. (2022). Social contract in Russia: Before and after 2022. Journal of Institutional Studies, 3, 74–90. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.3.074-090 (in Russian).
  5. Bard A., Söderqvist J. (2004). Netokratiya. Novaya pravyashchaya elita i zhizn' posle kapitalizma [Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism]. Saint Petersburg: Stokgol'mskaya shkola ekonomiki v Sankt-Peterburge.
  6. Barro R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
  7. Brockmann H., Drews W., Torpey J. (2021). A class for itself? On the worldviews of the new tech elite. PLoS ONE, 16(1), e0244071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244071
  8. Broockman D.E., Ferenstein G, Malhotra N. (2019). Predispositions and the political behavior of American economic elites: Evidence from technology entrepreneurs. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 212–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12408
  9. Castells M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 29(1), 238–266.
  10. Chen S., Urminsky O. (2019). The role of causal beliefs in political identity and voting. Cognition, 188, 27–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.003
  11. Ditto P.H., Lopez D.F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584.
  12. Easterly W., Levine R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203-50.
  13. Enikolopov R., Rochlitz М., Schoors K.J.L., Zakharov N. (2022). The Effect of Independent Online Media in an Autocracy. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4131355. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4131355
  14. Erikson R., Mackuen M., Stimson J. (2001). The Macro Polity. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139086912
  15. Floridia A. (2013). Participatory Democracy Versus Deliberative Democracy: Еlements for a Possible Theoretical Genealogy. Two Histories, Some Intersections. Paper Presented at the 7th ECPR General Conference, Sciences Po, Bordeaux, September 4–7. Available at: https:// ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/71d7f83c-3fe4-4b11-82a2-c151cd3769f4.pdf
  16. Frank R.H. (2016). Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  17. Garrison Y.L., Rice A., Liu W.M. (2021). The American meritocracy myth stress: Scale development and initial validation. The Counseling Psychologist, 49(1), 80–105. DOI: 10.1177/0011000020962072
  18. Gilens M., Page B. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592714001595
  19. Grechikhin V.G. (2020). Problems of social justice and inequality in modern Russian society. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya=Theory and Practice of Social Development, 5(147), 14–17 (in Russian).
  20. Guriev S., Treisman D. (2019). Informational autocrats. Journal of Economic Per¬spectives, 33(4), 100–127. DOI: 10.1257/jep.33.4.100
  21. Guriev S., Treisman D. (2020). A theory of informational autocracy. Journal of Public Economics, 186(104158). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104158.
  22. Habermas J. (2001). Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoi teorii [The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
  23. Helberger N. (2020). The political power of platforms: How current attempts to regulate misinformation amplify opinion power. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 842–854. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2020.1773888
  24. Higley J. (2006). Democracy and the elites. Politiya, 2, 22–31 (in Russian).
  25. Holcombe R.G. (2021). Elite influence on general political preferences. Journal of Government and Economics, 3(C), 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jge.2021.100021
  26. Holcombe R.G. (2023). Following Their Leaders: Political Preferences and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009323178
  27. Ilyin V.A., Morev M.V. (2022). A framework for a new Social Contract is being formed in Russia. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(6), 9–34. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.6.84.1 (in Russian).
  28. Kern H.L., Hainmueller J. (2009). Opium for the masses: How foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis, 17(4), 377–399.
  29. Littler J. (2017). Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility. New York: Routledge.
  30. López M., Dubrow J.K. (2020). Politics and inequality in comparative perspective: A research agenda. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(9), 1199–1210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220941234
  31. Lord C.G., Ross L., Lepper M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polar¬ization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
  32. Makarov V.L. (2010). Sotsial'nyi klasterizm. Rossiiskii vyzov [Social Clusterism. Russian Challenge]. Moscow: Biznes Atlas.
  33. Markovits D. (2019). The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite. New York: Penguin Press.
  34. Michels R. (2001). Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
  35. Mijs J.B. (2021). The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 7–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051
  36. Mikhaylenok O.M., Malysheva G.A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic – new stage of social digital transformation. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye znaniya, 7(1), 28–39 (in Russian).
  37. Monroe A.D. (1998). Public opinion and public policy 1980–¬1993. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 6–28.
  38. Mullainathan S., Washington E. (2009). Sticking with your vote: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(1), 86–111.
  39. Ostrom E. (2013). Upravlenie obshchim. Evolyutsiya institutsii kollektivnogo deistviya [Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action]. Kiev.
  40. Pareto V. (1995). History – the cemetery of the elites. Politicheskaya mysl', 3.
  41. Polterovich V.M. (2021). Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy. Voprosy ekonomiki, 52–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72 (in Russian).
  42. Polterovich V.M. (2022a). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 1. The Seven of European leaders. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty. tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(2), 31–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.2 (in Russian).
  43. Polterovich V.M. (2022b). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership – collaborative advantage. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(3), 42–57. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2 (in Russian).
  44. Przeworski A. (2022). Formal models of authoritarian regimes: A critique. Perspectives on Politics, 1–10. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592722002067
  45. Rawls J. (2010). Teoriya spravedlivosti [a Theory of Justice]. Second edition. Moscow: URSS; LKI.
  46. Rodrik D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. CEPR Discussion Papers 4767. Available at: https://cepr.org/publications/DP4767
  47. Srnicek N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Wiley.
  48. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2023). Social contract: Historical and contemporary realities in Soviet/Russian society. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(3), 39–53. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.3.87.2 (in Russian).
  49. Zuboff S. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. DOI: 10.1057/jit.2015.5

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article