VolRC RAS scientific journal
RuEn

Journal section "Environmental economics"

Consideration of Ecosystem Functions in Assessing the Condition of Natural Capital in the Northern Region

Tikhonova T.V.

Volume 16, Issue 4, 2023

Tikhonova T.V. (2023). Consideration of ecosystem functions in assessing the condition of natural capital in the northern region. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16(4), 186–202. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.10

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.10

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Burkhard B., Müller F. (2013). Indikatoren und Quantifizierungsansätze. In: Grunewald K., Bastian O. (Eds.). Ökosystemdienstleistungen – Konzept, Methoden und Fallbeispiele. Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum Verlag. Available at: https://www.springer.com/de/book/
  2. Dmitrieva T.E. (2022). Approaches to assessment of natural capital: foreign experience. Izvestiya Komi nauchnogo tsentra Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya “Ekonomicheskie nauki”=Proceedings of the Komi Science Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series “Economic Sciences”, 3(55), 35–46. DOI 10.19110/1994-5655-2022-3-35–46 (in Russian).
  3. Dolman A.J., Shvidenko A., Schepaschenko D. et al. (2012). An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion methods. Biogeosciences, 9, 5323–5340. DOI:10.5194/bg-9-5323-2012
  4. Ekosistemnye uslugi Rossii: Prototip natsional'nogo doklada. T. 1. Uslugi nazemnykh ekosistem (2016) [Ecosystem Services in Russia: Prototype of the National Report. Vol. 1. Services of Terrestrial Ecosystems (2016).]. Moscow: Izd-vo Tsentra okhrany dikoi prirody.
  5. Ekosistemnye uslugi Rossii: Prototip natsional'nogo doklada. T. 2. Bioraznoobrazie i ekosistemnye uslugi: printsipy ucheta v Rossii (2020) [Ecosystem Services in Russia: Prototype of the National Report. Vol. 2. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Accounting Principles in Russia (2020)]. Moscow: Izd-vo Tsentra okhrany dikoi prirody.
  6. Klimanova O.A. (Ed.). (2021). Ekosistemnye uslugi Rossii: Prototip natsional'nogo doklada. T. 3. Zelenaya infrastruktura i ekosistemnye uslugi krupneishikh gorodov Rossii [Ecosystem Services in Russia: Prototype of the National Report. Vol. 3. Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services of the Largest Cities of Russia]. Moscow: Izd-vo Tsentra okhrany dikoi prirody.
  7. Kozubov G.M., Taskaev A.I. (Eds.). (2000). Lesnoe khozyaistvo i lesnye resursy Respubliki Komi [Forestry and Forest Resources of the Komi Republic]. Moscow: Izdatel'sko-prodyuserskii tsentr “Dizain. Informatsiya. Kartografiya”.
  8. Kripa S., Bandana S., Biraj A. et al. (2023). Ecosystem services valuation for conservation and development decisions: A review of valuation studies and tools in the Far Eastern Himalaya. Ecosystem Services, 61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101526
  9. Lebedev Yu.V., Neklyudov I.A. (2012). Otsenka vodookhranno-vodoreguliruyushchei roli lesov [Assessment of the Water Protection and Water-Regulating Role of Forests]. Yekaterinburg: UGLTU.
  10. Likhanova N.V. (2012). Biodiversity and biomass сhanges of ground cover plants on clear felling sites of spruce forests in the middle taiga. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 14(1)(5), 1309–1312 (in Russian).
  11. Lilford E. (2023). Natural resources: Cost of capital and discounting – risk and uncertainty. Resources Policy, 80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103242
  12. Ptichnikov A.V., Karelin D.V., Kotlyakov V.M. et al. (2019). Applicability of international indicators of land degradation neutrality estimation for Russian boreal forests. Doklady Akademii nauk, 489(2), 195–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-56524892195-198 (in Russian).
  13. Ruqian Zhang, Penghui Li, Liping Xu, Shuai Zhong (2023). Reconciling ecological footprint and ecosystem services in natural capital accounting: Applying a novel framework to the Silk Road Economic Belt in China. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117115
  14. Syrbe R., Rosenberg M., Vowinckel J. (2013). SzenarioEntwicklung und partizipative Verfahren. In: Grunewald K., Bastian O. (Eds.) Ökosystemdienstleistungen – Konzept, Methoden und Fallbeispiele. Berlin: Springer.
  15. Tikhonova T.V. (2017). Environmental and economic assessment of water regulation function of rural territories in the Republic of Komi. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 10(3), 209–226. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2017.3.51.11 (in Russian).
  16. Tikhonova T.V. (2022). Approaches to measuring ecosystem services on a forest management territory. Izvestiya KNTs=Proceedings of the Komi Science Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series “Economic Sciences”, 3, 56–65. DOI: 10.19110/1994-5655-2022-3-56-65 (in Russian).
  17. Tishkov A.A. (2010). Biosphere functions and ecosystem services of National Park “Valdayskiy”. Tr. NP “Valdaiskii”=Proceedings of National Park “Valdaiskiy”, 1, 70–77 (in Russian).
  18. Tishkov A.A. (Ed.). (2002). Ekonomika sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya [Economics of Biodiversity Conservation]. Moscow: Proekt GEF “Sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya Rossiiskoi Federatsii”, Institut ekonomiki prirodopol'zovaniya.
  19. Uchet i otsenka ekosistemnykh uslug – Opyt, osobenno Germanii i Rossii (2014) [Accounting and Evaluation of Ecosystem Services – Experience, Especially in Germany and Russia (2014)]. Compiled by K. Grunevald, O. Bastian, A. Drozdov, V. Grabovskii. Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Bonn. Available at: http://www.kulunda.eu/sites/default/files/BfN_Skript_373.pdf
  20. Zegeye G., Erifo S., Addis G., Gebre G.G. (2023). Economic valuation of urban forest using contingent valuation method: The case of Hawassa city. Trees, Forests and People, 12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100398

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article